Build Your Agent Army
One repeatable method for building AI agents that do your work. Six moves, all plain English, no code. Marketing is the lens. It is not the limit.
If someone sent you this
Then somebody at your company just handed you a new capability, and probably a new expectation. Here's the thirty-second version.
An agent is a scheduled AI task: a job described once, saved as a reusable skill, and run on a clock. It reads your data, reasons about it, and delivers something useful, like a Monday-morning report on last week's ad spend, written in plain English. It never spends money or publishes anything on its own. A human always decides.
This page teaches one repeatable method for building agents: six moves, all in plain English, no code. The examples are marketing because that's usually where the pain starts, but the method works on anything.
Start at Move 1. Copy the first line into Claude. You'll have your first agent running before lunch.
The Cheat Sheet: Build Both Agents
Download the one-page cheat sheet (PDF)An agent is a scheduled Claude task: it reads your data, reasons, and produces. You decide before anything spends or publishes. An army is many of them, some feeding each other.
Everything you need is on this screen. Six moves, run twice: once to build the agent that does the work, once to build the agent that keeps it honest. Copy each line into Claude, answer its questions in plain language, and make the calls only you can make. No code anywhere.
First time? Wire it up first: the twenty-minute setup
Part 1 · Connect Google Ads to Windsor
- Sign up at windsor.ai. The free plan (one data source, one account) is all you need.
- Add a Google Ads source in Windsor and authenticate your account, granting read access.
- Confirm Windsor sees your data: it should show your campaigns and recent metrics.
Part 2 · Connect Windsor to Claude
- In Claude, add the Windsor connector from the connector directory and sign in. Nothing to install.
- Verify it worked. Paste this into Claude:
You: What data sources do you have access to? Then pull a quick summary of my Google Ads account via Windsor: how many campaigns are active, total spend month to date, and my top 3 campaigns by spend. Just confirm you can see the data, no analysis yet.
If Claude lists Google Ads via Windsor and returns your real numbers, you're wired. If not, recheck the Windsor source setup first; nine times out of ten the issue is there, not in Claude.
tired of typing? This whole method is a conversation, so have it out loud. Wispr Flow turns your voice into clean text anywhere you can type, about four times faster than your keyboard.
1State the goal
Let Claude interview you. Don't write the perfect prompt; say what you want and answer its questions.
Agent #1 · The Reporter
You: My goal is an agent that emails me a weekly Google Ads report I'll actually read. Help me build it. Ask me what you need.
Agent #2 · The Honesty Agent
You: My goal is a second agent that checks whether my weekly-google-ads-summary agent is still healthy: still connected, and still measuring the right things. Help me build it.
2Shape the output together
Push back like an editor reviewing a draft, in plain language. Nothing to copy here; this is where you say what you want.
Agent #1 · The Reporter
You, in our build: Kill the table, I won't read it. Fold any number that matters into the sentences. Flag anything that looks too good to be true and tell me how to verify it. Keep it under a page.
Agent #2 · The Honesty Agent
You, in our build: If the check ever comes back clean, don't email me anything. Silence means healthy. I only want to hear from this agent when something's actually wrong.
3Test it live
Run it once on your real data, with your eyes on it. Never schedule a job you haven't watched work.
Agent #1 · The Reporter
You: Run it on the last 7 days.
Agent #2 · The Honesty Agent
You: Run the health check now.
4Package it as a skill
One sentence turns the whole conversation into a tool you can run by name, hand to a teammate, and improve in one place.
Agent #1 · The Reporter
You: Turn this whole thing into a skill I can run by name. Call it weekly-google-ads-summary. Everything we decided: my business context, the sections, under a page, the verification flags.
Agent #2 · The Honesty Agent
You: Turn this into a skill I can run by name. Call it agent-health-check.
5Put it on the clock
Schedule it in the cloud; laptop closed, it still fires. The guardrail sentence goes into every schedule you ever set: the failure you want is loud.
Agent #1 · The Reporter
You: Every Monday at 8 AM, run weekly-google-ads-summary and email it to me. One rule: if you can't reach the ads data, or anything looks broken or incomplete, email me a short note saying exactly that instead of a normal report.
Agent #2 · The Honesty Agent
You: Run agent-health-check every Monday at 7:45 AM, fifteen minutes before weekly-google-ads-summary fires. If it finds a problem, tell me instead of letting the report run.
6Keep the human gate
Nothing to paste. Your agents read, analyze, draft, and warn. They do not spend, publish, or change systems on their own. And the watcher flags, it never fixes. Every output goes to a human who decides. That line is the whole design, and it's why you can build fearlessly.
Run it twice
Agent #1 · The Reporter
weekly-google-ads-summary · Mondays 8:00 AM. Does the work.
Agent #2 · The Honesty Agent
agent-health-check · Mondays 7:45 AM, before the report. It flags; it never fixes.
The second build goes faster. That speed is the method working, not a coincidence.
Your battle plan
Build in-house
Run the agent yourself. Full control, full speed.
Hybrid
Keep pieces of the partner relationship, agent the rest.
Keep the partner
And demand more. You now know what more looks like.
For every function your company pays someone else to do, you now have a move. Choose from a position of knowing. The Monday move: build ONE agent this week. One agent, one habit; the rest compounds.
Everything above is enough to build both agents today. What follows is the why and the worked dialogues, for whoever keeps reading.
The Gap
Let me ask you something, and I want you to answer it honestly before you read another line.
If I told you, right now, to go to your office and build an AI agent, could you do it?
Not "could you use ChatGPT." Not "could you write a clever prompt." Could you build an agent: a piece of AI that does a real job in your business, on a schedule, whether or not you remember it exists?
Most of the people I work with are smart, capable, and use AI every day. They draft emails with it. They summarize documents with it. Some of them are genuinely good at it. And almost none of them can build an agent. Not because it's hard. Because nobody ever showed them the move.
That gap, between using AI and putting AI to work, is the entire subject of this page. It is also, I believe, the biggest opportunity sitting in front of you right now. Closing it will change how you work. I don't say that lightly, and I intend to prove it, not just claim it.
What an agent actually is
Let's define the term honestly, because "agent" gets thrown around with a lot of glitter on it.
An agent is a scheduled Claude task. It's a job you've described once, saved as a reusable skill, and put on a clock. At the appointed time it wakes up, reads your data, reasons about what it sees, and produces something useful: a report in your inbox, a draft waiting for review, a warning that something looks off. Then it goes back to sleep until next time.
You decide what it reads. You decide what it produces. And one rule holds through this entire page: an agent reads, it doesn't act. Nothing spends money, publishes to the world, or changes your systems without a human saying go. The agent does the producing; you do the deciding.
That's it. No robots, no science fiction. If you want to call it a scheduled task or a bot, be my guest. What matters isn't the word. What matters is what it replaces: every recurring piece of work that today requires you to remember, to nag, or to pay someone.
An army is what you have when you've built several of them. Different agents watching different parts of your business, each one reliable, some of them feeding each other. That's not a metaphor I chose for drama. When you have five of these running, "army" is simply what it feels like: a staff that never forgets, never gets bored of the boring work, and reports for duty every Monday at 8 AM.
Why marketing is the lens, and why it isn't the point
We're going to build your first agents in marketing. I want to be straight with you about why, and about why that choice doesn't limit anything.
Marketing is where the gap usually hurts first. It's the function your company is most likely renting from an outside firm, at real cost, with the least visibility into what it's getting. Someone at your company can say what the backups did last night. Can anyone say what the ad spend did last week? That asymmetry makes marketing the perfect proving ground: the data is yours, the pain is real, and the before-and-after is impossible to miss.
But hear this clearly, because it's the sentence this whole page hangs on: my goal is that you leave able to build an agent army for anything. We're using marketing as today's lens. The method you'll learn, the same six moves every time, works on your sales pipeline, your service queue, your bookkeeping backlog, and every other job you dread or outsource. Marketing is where we practice. It is not where this ends.
The promise, and how I'll keep it
Here's what this page will do, and what it won't.
First, the method: six moves that take you from "I wish somebody would just handle this" to a working agent on a schedule. It's short. That's deliberate. The method is the product, and it fits in your head.
Then the build. You'll put together a real agent, on your own data, by doing something most people have never tried: having a conversation with Claude about your goal and letting Claude help you build the thing. Not pasting a magic prompt. Building. There's a difference, and it's the difference between owning a fish and knowing how to fish.
By the bottom of this page you'll know how to grow one agent into an army, how to keep the army honest, and how to decide, for every function your company currently pays for, whether to bring it in-house, run a hybrid, or keep your vendor and demand a lot more for the money.
What this page won't do is bury you in tactics. There's no channel-by-channel marketing manual here. Tools change too fast for that, and honestly, so does the AI itself. What doesn't change is the method. I've kept the tool-specific details in clearly marked boxes you can check against the current state of the world, and I've kept the spine of this page on the one thing that will still be true years from now: the skill of telling an AI what job you need done, and building the worker together.
One conversation from now, you'll see the whole machine. Keep reading.
The Anatomy of an Agent
Every agent you will ever build has the same five parts. Once you can see them, you can build an agent for anything, because building one becomes a matter of answering five questions instead of staring at a blank page.
Let me show you the whole skeleton, then we'll walk it bone by bone.
You state a goal. You shape it with Claude in a conversation. The result gets saved as a skill. The skill goes on a schedule. The output lands where you'll see it. That's the life cycle of every agent on this page, and you'll watch the same shape repeat every time we build one.
The five parts
Data in: what the agent can see.
An agent is only as good as what it can see. Claude on its own knows nothing about your ad account, your CRM, or your ticket queue. Connectors fix that. A connector (you'll also hear "MCP," the plumbing standard behind them) is a wire between Claude and a system you use, and it's how your agent gets eyes. Wiring one up is a one-time job, about twenty minutes, and the cheat sheet at the top of this page names the connector we use. For now the question to hold onto is simple: what does this agent need to see to do its job?
Context: what the agent knows about you.
Two businesses can run the same report and need completely different things flagged. Context is where your agent learns what matters to yours: what you sell, who you sell it to, what a customer is worth, what "good" looks like. You provide it once, in plain English, and every run benefits. This is the difference between a generic report and one that reads like it was written by someone who knows your business. Because, in a real sense, it was.
The operation: the job itself, saved as a skill.
A skill is the job description, written down. It's the instruction that says: pull last week's numbers, compare to the week before, tell me what worked, what didn't, and what to do next, in plain language, and flag anything that looks wrong. You'll build this by conversation, not from scratch, and once it exists you invoke it by name. The same job, done the same way, every time. If you've ever written a runbook or an SOP for an employee, you already understand skills. They're SOPs for a worker who actually follows them.
Reasoning: Claude, the part you don't build.
Between the data and the output sits the thinking: noticing that clicks went up while conversions went down, connecting a spend spike to a search-term change, deciding what deserves the headline. That's Claude, and it's the piece of this stack you never have to build, tune, or maintain. Your job is to point it at the right data with the right context. The reasoning comes free, and it gets better on its own schedule, not yours.
The clock: what makes it an agent.
Everything up to here describes a very good tool you could run by hand. The clock is what changes its species. Put the skill on a schedule and it stops being something you do and becomes something that happens. The report shows up Monday at 8 AM whether you slept well, traveled, or forgot it existed. The schedule runs in the cloud, so nothing depends on your laptop being open. And every schedule you set gets one guardrail instruction, which we'll build into your first agent below: if something's wrong, tell me. Don't send me a beautiful report full of holes.
⏱ Current as of July 2026. The scheduling layer here is Cowork, part of the Claude family, on a paid plan. Scheduled tasks run in Anthropic's cloud: your machine can be off and the agent still fires. Product names, plan tiers, and menus move fast; the five parts don't. If a detail here doesn't match your screen, trust the anatomy and check the vendor's current docs.
Why this matters: the sentence to keep
Here's the whole section in one line, and it's worth saying out loud:
Data comes in, context shapes it, the skill defines the work, Claude reasons, and the clock makes it a department instead of a demo.
That last phrase is the one I want tattooed somewhere you'll see it. A prompt you run when you remember is a demo. It impresses you once and then life happens. A skill on a clock is a department: it has a job, a cadence, and an output someone reads. Nobody builds a business on demos.
When you look at any task in your business through this lens, the blank page disappears and five short questions take its place. What does it need to see? What does it need to know about us? What exactly is the job? Is this analysis Claude can reason through? And when should it run, and where should the output land?
Answer those five and you have specified an agent, whether the job is marketing, sales follow-up, or watching your ticket queue. In the next section I'll show you the six moves that turn those answers into a running worker, and I'll show you the part almost nobody knows: you don't have to answer the questions alone. The first move is letting Claude interview you.
The Method: Six Moves
This is the heart of this page. Everything before this point was setup; everything after it is proof.
The method is six moves. They're the same six for a marketing agent, a sales agent, or an agent that watches anything else you care about. Learn them once and you own them. None of them requires technical skill. Every one of them happens in plain English, in a conversation.
Here they are, all together. Then we'll take them one at a time.
- 1State the goal, and let Claude interview you.
- 2Shape the output together.
- 3Test it live.
- 4Package it as a skill.
- 5Put it on the clock.
- 6Keep the human gate.
1State the goal, and let Claude interview you
Here's the move almost nobody makes, and it changes everything. Don't try to write the perfect prompt. State the goal and hand Claude the job of scoping it:
"My goal is an agent that sends me a weekly report on my ad spend that I'll actually read. Help me build it. Ask me whatever you need to know."
Then answer the questions. Claude will ask about your business, your customers, your budget, what decisions you're trying to make. This feels almost too simple, and it is the single biggest unlock on this page. You stop performing the job of an AI expert and start doing the job you're actually great at: knowing your business and making decisions. Scoping the work is work, and you just delegated it.
Every build on this page starts with this move, and by the third time you use it you'll wonder why you ever started anywhere else.
2Shape the output together
Claude will propose what the output should look like: sections, metrics, format. Your job is to push back like an editor reviewing a draft, not like a programmer debugging code. "Cut the impressions table, I never read it." "Add a section on wasted spend." "Shorter. Plainer. Lead with the one thing I need to know."
Notice what you're doing here: directing, not prompting. You already know how to do this, because it's the same thing you do with any employee's first draft. The difference is this employee revises in seconds and never takes it personally.
3Test it live
Run the job once, on your real data, with your eyes on it. Not a sample, not a hypothetical. Real numbers from your real account.
This move has two jobs. First, it catches problems while they're cheap: a misread date range, a metric that doesn't mean what you thought. Second, and I'd argue more important, it's where belief happens. There is a moment, and you'll know it when it hits, when the output lands and it's about your business, your numbers, your week, and it's good. That moment is worth more than every claim on this page. Never skip the live test, and never schedule a job you haven't watched work.
4Package it as a skill
Once the output is right, one more sentence: "Turn this into a skill I can run by name. Call it weekly-ad-report."
What just happened is the leap from a clever conversation to a tool. The whole job, your context, your format, your rules, now lives under one name. You can run it anytime with three words. You can hand it to someone on your team. You can improve it in one place and every future run gets the improvement. Sixty lines of hard-won instruction just became an asset your business owns.
If you've run a prompt more than twice, it should be a skill. That rule alone will change how you work.
5Put it on the clock
Now the species change: "Run weekly-ad-report every Monday at 8 AM and email it to me."
One more sentence goes into every schedule you ever set, and I mean every one: "If you can't get to the data, or anything looks off, send me a note saying so instead of a normal report." That guardrail is the difference between an agent you trust and an agent that quietly rots. Data connections break. Logins expire. The failure you want is loud.
The schedule runs in the cloud. Laptop closed, phone off, on a beach: the report still lands. This is the moment the work stops being yours.
6Keep the human gate
The last move is the one you never stop making. Your agents read, analyze, draft, and warn. They do not spend, publish, or change systems on their own. Every output flows to a human who decides.
This isn't timidity, and it isn't a training-wheels phase you'll outgrow. It's the design. The entire value of the army rests on your judgment staying in the loop at the moments that matter. Claude produces; you decide. Guard that line and you can build agents fearlessly, because nothing can go wrong at machine speed that a human didn't approve at human speed.
That's the entire skill
Six moves. Goal, shape, test, package, clock, gate. No code, no jargon, nothing you couldn't do this afternoon.
I know it looks too small to be the whole thing. It's the whole thing. The rest of this page is watching it work: once in full detail on a real marketing agent, then again and again on new targets, faster each time, until the pattern is so obvious you'll start seeing agents everywhere you look in your business.
Which is the point.
The First Recruit: Build It
Agent #1 · The Reporter
This is where you stop reading and start building. You're going to recruit your first agent: a weekly Google Ads report that lands in your inbox every Monday at 8 AM, written in plain English, about the money your company spends.
I'm going to show you the entire build as the conversation it actually is. The dialogue below is condensed for the page, but every beat of it is real, and yours will follow the same shape. You'll see all six moves from the method above fire in order. Where your conversation differs from this one, good. It's supposed to. That's what building looks like.
One prerequisite: your Google Ads data needs to be wired to Claude through a connector. We use Windsor.ai's free plan, and it takes about twenty minutes. If Claude can answer "what data sources do you have access to?" with your ad account in the list, you're ready.
1State the goal
Open Claude and say what you want. Not a prompt. A goal.
You: My goal is an agent that sends me a weekly report on my Google Ads account. Something I'll actually read on a Monday morning. Help me build it. Ask me whatever you need to know.
Claude: Happy to. A few questions so this report is about your business and not a generic dashboard: What does your business do, and who's the customer you're trying to reach? Roughly what do you spend a month, and what's a new customer worth to you? What's the action you most want from an ad: calls, form fills, purchases? And when this report lands Monday morning, what decision do you want it to help you make?
Look at what just happened. You wrote two sentences, and the AI is now doing the job a consultant would charge you for: scoping the work. Answer honestly and in plain language. This is you being interviewed by your new hire, and everything you say becomes the context every future report is built on.
You: We're a managed IT services company. Customers are small businesses in our region, 10 to 100 employees. We spend about four thousand a month. A new customer is worth a lot, five figures over the contract. We want form fills and calls. Monday morning I want to know one thing: is the money working, and if not, where's it leaking?
2Shape the output together
Claude: Here's the report I'd propose, five sections: The Headline, two sentences on the single most important thing that happened. What Worked, with the why. What Didn't, with the likely cause. Where the Money Leaked, search terms and campaigns that spent without converting. Next Week, three specific recommended actions. Plus a short table of the core numbers, week over week. Want me to adjust anything?
Now direct. You're an editor reviewing a draft, and the draft took nine seconds.
You: Kill the table, I won't read it. Fold any number that matters into the sentences. Add one thing: anything that looks weird or too good to be true, flag it and tell me how to verify it. Keep the whole thing under a page.
Claude: Done. Plain-English report, under a page, five sections, numbers woven into the prose, plus a "Numbers Worth Checking" note whenever something looks off. Want to run it on last week right now and see it?
Yes. You do.
3Test it live
You: Run it on the last 7 days.
The Headline. Form fills rose from 9 to 14 this week, and cost per lead fell by nearly a third. The money is working harder than it did last week.
Where the money leaked. One search term ate a third of the week's spend with zero conversions, third week running. Recommendation in Next Week.
What Worked · What Didn't · Next Week ↓
A sample, condensed. Yours reads like this, about your account.
What comes back is about your account. Real spend, real search terms, real waste. The first time you read one of these, something shifts. This is the visibility your company's been paying for and not getting, and it took ninety seconds, and you can argue with it:
You: You flagged the "IT support near me" campaign as the leak. Why? What would you do about it before next Monday?
It answers. With reasons, from your data. A PDF from your agency can't do that, and this is the moment most people understand, in their gut, what their company has actually been renting all these years.
Read your own first report closely. Push on it. Ask the follow-up. This test run is where you catch the date range that's off or the metric that surprised you, and it's where trust gets built, one verified claim at a time. Do not skip it, and do not schedule anything you haven't watched work.
4Package it as a skill
The conversation above is now sixty lines of hard-won specification: your business, your customer, your budget, your format, your rules. Save the whole thing under one name.
You: This is right. Turn this whole thing into a skill I can run by name. Call it weekly-google-ads-summary. Everything we decided: my business context, the five sections, under a page, the verification flags.
Claude: Done. Say "run weekly-google-ads-summary" and you'll get exactly this report for the trailing 7 days.
Three words now do what sixty lines did. You can run it whenever you want, hand it to a teammate, or improve it once and have every future run inherit the change. This is the leap from a good conversation to an asset the business owns. It outlives the chat window, and it outlives your memory of how you built it.
5Put it on the clock
Now the species change. In Cowork:
You: Every Monday at 8 AM, run weekly-google-ads-summary and email it to me. One rule: if you can't reach the ads data, or anything looks broken or incomplete, email me a short note saying exactly that instead of a normal report. Never send me a report you couldn't fully build.
That second sentence is the guardrail, and it goes into every schedule you ever create. The failure you want is loud. A missing report gets noticed; a confidently wrong one gets trusted.
The schedule runs in the cloud. Close the laptop. The agent doesn't care. Monday at 8 AM, it wakes up, reads your week, writes your report, and puts it in your inbox, whether you're at your desk or on a chairlift.
Trigger it once right now instead of waiting for Monday. Watch the run happen without your hands on anything. That's your agent. Working.
6The gate you keep
Notice what this agent cannot do: it can't change a bid, pause a campaign, or spend a dollar. It reads and it reports. When it says "pause the near-me campaign," that's a recommendation arriving at a human gate, and the human is you. You'll make that call in thirty seconds with better information than you've ever had, and that's exactly the division of labor: the agent does the producing, you do the deciding.
As your army grows, that never changes.
What you actually just did
Take stock, because this matters more than the report.
You didn't learn a prompt. You stated a goal, answered questions about your own business, made a few editorial decisions, and said three sentences of plain English at the right moments. Claude did the drafting, the packaging, and the scheduling. That's the whole method, and you just ran it end to end on a real function with real money attached.
Here's the short version of why this beats the prompt you could have pasted from some library: the pasted prompt gives you one artifact. What you just did gives you the method that produced it, which means Monday's report is the least of what you now own. Point the same six moves at anything.
Which is exactly where we're going next. Same moves. New targets. Watch how fast the second one goes.
The Second Recruit: The Honesty Agent
Agent #2 · The Honesty Agent
You have one agent now. It reads your Google Ads account every Monday and tells you the truth about your ad spend. Here's the thing nobody tells you about agents: they can go quiet. A login expires. A connection drops. Your budget doubles and the report keeps grading against last quarter's numbers. The agent doesn't lie to you on purpose. It just keeps confidently reporting against a world that's moved on, and you don't find out until something's already gone wrong.
So you're going to recruit a second agent, and its only job is to watch the first one.
This build goes faster. Not because it's less important, if anything it matters more, but because you already know the six moves. Watch how much less thinking this takes.
1State the goal
Same opening move as last time. State the goal, let Claude interview you.
You: My goal is a second agent that checks whether my weekly-google-ads-summary agent is still healthy: still connected, and still measuring the right things. Help me build it.
Claude: Two different kinds of "not healthy," so let's separate them. First, is it broken: can it still reach your Google Ads data, and did last week's report actually go out? Second, is it stale: are the assumptions it's running on, your budget, what counts as a good result, still true, or has your business moved past them? Which of those matters more to catch fast, and which can wait a few weeks?
Notice the question. You're not being asked to write logic. You're being asked what you actually care about, same as last time.
You: Broken matters fast, catch it before Monday. Stale I can live with checking monthly. If my budget or goals change I'll usually remember to say something, but check anyway.
2Shape the output together
Claude: Here's what I'd propose. Before your weekly report runs, a quick check: is the Google Ads connection responding, did data come back, did last week's report actually send. If any of that fails, you get a short alert instead of silence. Separately, once a month, a note: "It's been 30 days, confirm your budget and goals are still current," so the report never quietly grades against old assumptions. Sound right?
You: Yes. Add one thing: if the check ever comes back clean, don't email me anything. I don't want a "still fine!" message every Monday. Silence means healthy. I only want to hear from this agent when something's actually wrong.
That last note is worth noticing. You just designed a piece of judgment into the agent: no news is good news. That's not a technical decision, it's a decision about your attention, and you're the only one who could have made it.
3Test it live
You: Run the health check now.
Claude: Connection responding, data current as of this morning, last week's report sent on schedule. Everything checks out, no alert needed. Also flagging: your budget/goals assumption was last confirmed when we built the first agent, 0 days ago, so the 30-day clock starts now.
Healthy is a quiet result, and that's exactly the point: you built something whose entire job is to fail loudly and succeed silently. The real test of an agent like this isn't watching it pass, it's knowing that if you'd starved the first agent's connection on purpose, this is the moment you'd have found out, before a bad report ever reached your inbox instead of after.
4Package it as a skill
You: Turn this into a skill I can run by name. Call it agent-health-check.
Claude: Done. Say "run agent-health-check" any time, and it'll run automatically on the schedule we set next.
5Put it on the clock
You: Run agent-health-check every Monday at 7:45 AM. Fifteen minutes before weekly-google-ads-summary fires. If it finds a problem, tell me instead of letting the report run.
This is the moment your two agents stop being two separate things and start being an army. One agent's result gates the next. The health check runs first; if it's clean, the report runs on schedule same as always. If it's not, you hear about the actual problem instead of receiving a report built on top of it.
Trigger it once, right now, and watch it run ahead of schedule, exactly like you did with the first one.
6The gate you keep, again
Same rule, and it matters even more here: this agent flags, it never fixes. It doesn't reconnect anything, doesn't reset a login, doesn't quietly adjust the first agent's assumptions on your behalf. If something's wrong, a human hears about it and a human decides what to do next. An agent that's allowed to silently repair the thing it's supposed to be watching isn't a safeguard anymore, it's a second thing you now have to trust blind.
What you actually just built
Two agents. One does the work, one keeps the first one honest. That pattern, an agent that watches another agent, is worth naming, because you'll use it again: anywhere you build an agent that matters, you can build a second one whose only job is making sure the first one still deserves your trust.
And notice, again, how you got here. Not a harder conversation. The same six moves, run a second time, faster, because you already knew the shape of it. That speed is the whole promise of this page, proven twice in one sitting.
Same moves. New targets, still ahead. But you're not walking into the next one alone anymore. You're walking in with an army of two.
Go build your first one Monday.
Stuck on a connector, or want a partner while you stand up your army? That's what we do. Email us and we'll walk through it with you.
Email the Ducks